First, let me clarify something I said on "My Glory Days" post. When I said I couldn't have gone into law as a career, I want to make clear that 'that's just me.' There are many careers that I might think is wrong for me, but that doesn't mean I think it's wrong for anyone else. Another person might be unable to conscientiously choose something I might do in perfectly good conscience. The Lord does give us a certain measure of free will, and I believe all these types of decisions fall under that. If we all chose the same career, there would be even more chaos than there already is! Thanks for your patience. Also ... any errors in re-posting the article below are my own.
Catholicism—Christian? Or Cultic?
Dave Hunt
First published in June, 1991
The
evangelical church today is being seduced as never in its history. It faces adanger
so grave that, although we have discussed this problem before, it must be addressed
again with new insight and vigor. If evangelicals succumb to the seduction, as
they increasingly are doing, then their gospel witness will be submerged in
confusion and could eventually be lost—a tragic and
new dimension to the apostasy from which the church and the world will never recover.
Most astonishing and alarming is the fact that (with few exceptions) evangelical
leaders and even the major cult watchers refuse to acknowledge this threat. We
are therefore compelled to address the subject once again with renewed concern.
For
decades evangelicals have diligently and faithfully attempted to identify,
analyze and warn the church against cults. Included in the standard list are
Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Christian Science, Unity School of
Christianity, Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, etc. Yet the most
seductive, dangerous, and largest cult (many times larger than all of the rest
combined) is not included in the list! Most cult experts refuse to identify
this horrendous cult as such!
Instead, they accept it as “Christian.”
Worst
of all, this cult (which preaches a false gospel that is sending hundreds of millions
into a Christless eternity) is now embraced as a partner in “evangelizing the
world” by many groups that preach the biblical gospel. Major denominations, such
as the Anglican and the Episcopalian church,
are involved in merger talks with this cult. The Assemblies of God hierarchy has
been engaged in “fruitful dialogue” with this cult, whose members are now
widely perceived as born-again Christians. As a consequence, the evangelical
church faces an unprecedented crisis that threatens its very survival.
The
above is a severe, solemn, and devastating charge to make—a charge that we have
documented in the past and in support of which additional evidence will now be given.
We challenge any church leader to a public debate who declares that this
assertion is false. If proven wrong, we will publicly repent. But if this
accusation is true, then a major shake-up in the evangelical church is required,
including repentance by many of its most highly regarded leaders. We solicit your
help in providing church leaders with the facts they need to identify this
cult—facts of which I [Dave] was ignorant years ago when I, too, failed to
identify the Roman Catholic
Church as the cult that it is.
What
is a “cult?” In his book, Rise of the Cults, Walter Martin defined cultism as
“...any major deviation from orthodox Christianity relative to the cardinal
doctrines of the Christian faith.” Though unmentioned by Martin, Roman
Catholicism is undeniably a “major deviation from orthodox Christianity” on
many “cardinal doctrines of the Christian faith,” and thus, by his own
definition, a cult. Recognition of this fact ignited the Reformation! To deny
that Roman Catholicism is a cult is to repudiate the Reformation and mock the
millions of martyrs who died at Rome’s hands, as though they gave their lives
in vain.
But,
says someone, since the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), the Roman Catholic
Church no longer teaches and practices what it did at the time of the
Reformation. That popular idea is false. To counter the Reformation, Rome’s
foremost theologians met from 1545-63 in the Council of Trent. Its Canons and
Decrees, which rejected every Reformation doctrine, remain the standard
authoritative statement of Roman Catholicism, and adherence thereto is required
by Catholic catechisms. Opening Vatican II, Pope John XXIII declared, “I do accept
entirely all that has been decided and declared at the Council of Trent.”
Vatican II went on to reaffirm Trent’s Canons and Decrees. No, Rome has not changed
since the Reformation—except superficially.
Were
Luther, Calvin, and the other Reformers alive today, they would denounce Roman
Catholicism as the largest and most dangerous cult on earth! Yet the Christian Research
Institute and other counter-cult groups refuse to classify it as a cult. In the
above book, Martin emphasized that the five major cults at that time had “a
followd-ing exceeding 8.5 million persons....” Yet he overlooked Roman
Catholicism’s hundreds of millions!
Answers
to Cultists at Your Door presents another example. Its authors, Bob and
Gretchen Passantino, are described as “experts in cult research [who] have
spent years in countercult ministry” (outside back cover of Witch Hunt). They
include such marks of a cult as the claim that it “is the only organization on
earth that is following God’s will” and that its leader is “uniquely chosen
by God to lead God’s people” and that it alone “offer[s] the Bible’s ‘true’ interpretation
on all matters.” Again, the Roman Catholic Church fully fits all of the criteria.
It claims to be the only true church, says that its pope is uniquely chosen to
lead all of God’s people, and explains that only its hierarchy can interpret
Scripture. Yet the Passantinos, like most other “cult experts,” fail to include
Roman Catholicism as a cult, though it meets all their own tests!
Mormons
must blindly obey Joseph Smith and his successors, JWs dare not question The
Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, and other cultists must submit to their
leaders. Such authoritarianism is the primary mark of a cult. The same blind submission
is required of all Catholics. Canon 212 of Catholicism’s Code of Canon Lawrequires
that Catholics must give absolute
obedience to their “sacred pastors.” Vatican II states repeatedly that only Catholicism’s
hierarchy can interpret the Bible and that papal pronouncements must be obeyed
without question. Canon 333 (Sec. 3) declares, “There is neither appeal nor
recourse against a decision or decree of the Roman Pontiff.” Vatican watchdog Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger’s recent 7,500-word “Instruction” declares that dissent about
church teachings cannot be “justified as a matter of following one’s
conscience.” No cult demands surrender of mind and conscience more fully or
arrogantly than Roman Catholicism.
Roman
Catholicism is not only left out of the list of cults by the experts, but it is
explicitly approved. For example, in Scripture Twisting, James W. Sire, long time
Editor-In-Chief of InterVarsity Press, defines a cult as having “doctrines
and/or practices that contradict those of the Scriptures as interpreted by
traditional Christianity as represented by the major Catholic and
Protestant denominations...” (emphasis his). Sire makes Catholicism a standard
of orthodoxy
against which cults are to be judged. Yet he accuses the cults of twisting
Scripture, a technique of which Rome is surely the ultimate master. Sire
indicts Mormonism as a cult for adding other revelations to the Bible—but Rome
has added far more new revelations to the Bible than the Mormon Church. Sire
declares, “There is no guru class in biblical Christianity, no
illuminati, no people through whom all proper interpretation must come”—yet that
is exactly the situation in the Roman Catholic Church! How, then, does he make it
the standard of orthodoxy?
Consider
also The Agony of Deceit published by Moody. Each chapter is written by a
leading evangelical about a specific false teaching within today’s church. While
Agony mostly repeats much that was found in Seduction of Christianity five years
earlier, it is another voice issuing many of the same warnings, for which we
are thankful. Yet it, too, whitewashes Roman Catholicism. On page 65 it states,
“Traditional Roman Catholicism...hold[s] to biblical inerrancy.” In fact,
Catholicism explicitly denies biblical inerrancy! The next sentence does
acknowledge that
the “messages [of Protestantism and Catholicism] are poles apart,” but moves
right on without identifying the vital differences.
Page
111 declares, “The Catholic church resisted the mounting heresies with regard to
the Person of Christ, and...Protestants would continue to affirm Catholic
Christology.” Again, terribly false! Catholicism’s Christology is heretical.
It denies Christ’s exclusive role as mediator between God and man, making Mary
“co-mediatrix”; it denies the exclusivity of His redemptive work, making Mary
“co-redemptrix” (Vatican II credits Mary with a perpetual “salvific role; she
continues to obtain by her constant intercession the graces we need for eternal
salvation”); and it denies the sufficiency of His redemptive work, declaring
that the redeemed must, in addition to Christ’s suffering for them upon the cross,
suffer for their own sins here and/or in purgatory, etc. A great deal more
heresy is involved in Catholic Christology, such as presenting Him as
perpetually an infant or child subject to His mother, perpetually on the
cross—but lack of space prevents further detail. The “Christ” of Roman
Catholicism is just as false as its “Mary”—as much “another
Jesus” as that of Mormonism or any other cult. Let’s admit it!
Several
times in Agony it is stated that Protestants and Catholics embrace the same
apostolic creeds. This is a partially true but seriously misleading statement. The
implication is that the creeds are an all-encompassing statement of biblical Christianity,
which they are not. Furthermore, there is a vast difference between the
meaning that Catholics and Protestants attach to what the creeds say. For
example, while affirming that Christ “suffered under Pontius Pilate,”
Catholicism teaches that His suffering was insufficient. In addition to
Christ’s suffering, we must each suffer for our sins in order to be saved. We
can even suffer for the salvation of others.(The
Apostolic Constitution of Jan. 1, 1967, Indulgentarium Doctrina, #1687, urges
Catholics to carry “each one his own cross in expiation of their sins and of
the sins of others...assist[ing] their brothers to obtain salvation from God.”)
This is rank heresy to Protestants. Yet Agony implies that
Catholics mean the same thing as Protestants by the creeds—an inexcusable and deadly
error in a book by eminent Christian scholars written to point out errors within
the church. Though this and the other books cited above contain much that
commends them, their approval of Catholicism is tragically misleading.
The
deviation by Catholicism from biblical Christianity goes to the heart of the faith,
to salvation itself, and thus affects the eternal destiny of those who are
deceived thereby. Roman Catholicism rejects salvation by faith and preaches a
false gospel of works that cannot save—salvation is not in Christ but in the
Church through submission to its edicts and sacraments. The Basic Catechism of
Christian Doctrine calls the sacraments “the chief means of our salvation.”
The
first of the seven sacraments is baptism, which is performed upon 98 percent
of Catholics as infants. It is declared in Canon 849 to be the means “by which men
and women are freed from their sins, are reborn as children of God....” The
Basic Catechism declares that baptism “is necessary for salvation...cleanses us
from original sin, makes us Christians....” Another sacrament is the Mass,
which the Catechism declares to be “one and the same Sacrifice with that of the
Cross, inasmuch as Christ...continues to offer himself...on the altar, through
the ministry of his priests.” Canon 904 states that “the work of redemption is continually
accomplished in the mystery of the Eucharistic Sacrifice,” thus denying Christ’s
triumphant “It is finished!”
Let
me remind you of Hugh Latimer’s last
words, spoken through the flames to his companion who was bound to the same stake:
“Be of good courage, master Ridley...for we shall by God’s grace this day light
such a ‘candle’ in England as I pray shall never go out!” Tragically, the
“candle” lit by hundreds of thousands of faithful martyrs burned at the stake,
if not already out, is barely flickering and in danger of being snuffed
completely. Paul Crouch, head of the largest Christian TV worldwide network,
demeans the martyrs by calling the issues they died for mere semantics; and he
makes a mockery of the Reformers by declaring orthodox the heresies that
sparked the Reformation.
Those
who believe Rome’s lies and follow her gospel of works for salvation are lost.
Failing to recognize this fact, many evangelical leaders and cult experts have themselves
been deceived by Rome and need to be confronted and informed. How tragic to
assume that Catholics are Christians who merely have some peripheral beliefs
and practices which seem peculiar to Protestants but which will not prevent them
from being saved. A false gospel is a false gospel, and it damns those who believe
it, whether preached by Mormonism or Catholicism. A cult is a cult. Roman Catholics,
like the members of other cults, need to be treated with compassion, warned of
cultic lies, and presented with the true gospel, which alone can save them.
If
you are concerned about the growing cooperation between Catholic organizations and
major evangelical ministries, please write to them and ask where they stand n
this critical issue. The questions could be: 1) What is your organization’s
position regarding Catholic doctrines? 2) What is your position regarding
organizational participation with Catholics in matters of world evangelization?
3) Are you presently either officially or unofficially involved with any
Catholic lay or clerical groups or organizations? If so, on what basis...and to
what end? TBC
Posts
