Thou Art Wretched and Miserable

A most amazing article. Food for much thought. God does work in strange and mysterious ways.

By Coach Dave Daubenmire
January 6, 2011
NewsWithViews.com

“Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: -Rev. 3:17

The story you are about to hear is true. Only the names have been changed to protect the innocent.

I always wanted to write that line that “Dragnet” made famous. It seems appropriate for this commentary. Although the names have NOT been changed, the story IS true.

This one will be a little different for me. If you are a regular reader of my commentaries you know that I am never shy about giving my opinion. In fact, as my children have told me a number of times, “Dad, you always think you are right.”

No kidding. Is it somehow nobler for one to always think he is wrong? I say what I think, and it is usually others that my words make blink.

But in a deviation from my normal “opinion” commentary, today I would like to relate to you a story from a recent event in my life. I will let you be the judge of what the lesson was, and what it was that the Lord wanted me to learn.

Here is my story.

Last Friday, New Year’s Eve-day, I joined with some of my friends in out-reach to the homeless on the streets of Columbus, Ohio. Although in the past, working with the homeless had been a regular part of our ministry, I am ashamed to admit that I had not worked with them in a couple of years. This seemed like another great opportunity to live out my faith.

Homeless ministry is interesting. Despite what you might think, most homeless are not hungry because there are many places where they can go to get meals. In fact, they are somewhat selective in what foods they take, preferring propane canisters to heat their stoves over bread and pastries.

The cold, and the addictions, are their greatest opponents. All of them have heard the Gospel, most, in fact, have repeated the “sinner’s prayer”, but very little evidence that they “know Jesus” is on display.

Working with the street-poor is dirty business. Most are addicted, many are poorly-educated, veterans are in the majority, and are totally dependant on handouts. In reality, a great majority would rather be homeless than accept responsibility for their lives. They would rather live under a bridge than have a mortgage and other financial demands.

They have traded their security for a tent, the trap of materialism for the freedom of homelessness.

Sometimes I leave there wondering who really is the one who is enslaved…

While moving from homeless camp to homeless camp last Friday, we found ourselves travelling down Broad Street…the main east to west artery in downtown Columbus. Driving slowly, looking for the helpless, my eyes lasered-on two obviously drunken men sitting against a bombed-out red-brick business.

“Hey! Are you guys hungry?” I bellowed out my car window. They stumbled to their feet, clutching their malt-liquor, and jay-walked across the street towards our free hand-outs. My friend, Pastor Bill, climbed out first and walked straight towards one of the men.

The next thing I knew, Bill has hugging this guy as the vagrant sobbed, slobbering all over Pastor Bill. I got out and sauntered up to the two, as the drunken man slurred some drunken-drivel all over Bill’s chest.

“Why Donald, what the heck has happened to you?” Bill spoke as if he recognized this low-life. Upon closer inspection I recognized “Donald” as a thirty-something young man who had done street ministry with us year’s ago. A one-time homeless man who had found Jesus, Donald had returned to lead others out of the clutches of sin. He had a powerful testimony, and was a powerful preacher of the Gospel…at least the last time I had seen him. As he slobbered all over Bill, my eyes fell to the Bible that Donald was clutching in his hands.

“Wow,” I thought to myself. What an abomination before the Lord…a brewsky in one hand and a Bible in the other. It was all I could do to keep from walking away.

But I didn’t. I don’t know why, because this drunken ex-preacher was about all I could take. But

I stayed to support my friend, Pastor Bill.

“Please pray for me Pastor Bill.” Donald wailed. “Please…I have done some terrible things.”

I wanted to smack him. How dare this man carry a Bible and mock our Lord. Didn’t he know that he was making a mockery of Christianity?

“No Donald. I am not going to pray for you.” Pastor Bill said. “YOU pray for you and the rest of us will agree with your prayer. The Lord needs to hear it out of YOUR mouth.”

Donald started sobbing harder, as he lay down his Miller tall-boy and clutched his black Bible against his tell-tale heart.

For the next ten minutes this slobbering drunk prayed the Word. Now, please understand what I am saying. From memory, this inebriated Christian (is that even possible) opened his mouth and spoke God’s Word with clarity and purpose. It was one of the most amazing things I had ever witnessed. I thought it was impossible for the Holy Spirit to indwell an unclean vessel.

It shook what I believed. I had always been taught that the Holy Spirit would not co-exist with another spirit…and a spirit of addiction was certainly controlling Donald’s life. As I walked towards the car a voice entered my mind. Not audible, mind you, but a real thought nonetheless.

“That’s what you look like to me; In fact, that is what most of you preachers look like to me. You are amazed that a drunk can speak the Word like that, but that is because you don’t realize what you look like to me. You watch this staggering drunk quoting from the Scriptures and you are appalled at how blasphemous it all seems to you.”

“But that is how you look to me…all of you…wretched and miserable…thinking you are rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing. You all look like drunks to me.”

“Me?” I thought to myself. “I look like that?”

“Yep,” returned the thought. “You stand up and preach the Word, but all of the while you are drunk with pride. Others are drunk with greed, or power, or gluttony, or envy, or cowardice, and week after week they stand in the pulpit and claim to speak for God. But you all look the same to me…wretched…miserable…poor…blind…naked.”

“What makes you think you are better than Donald? Do you really think a drunken preacher is less holy than a prideful preacher? Believe me; God has always used asses…”

For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

I don’t know what happened to Donald. I don’t understand how that demon of alcohol could get such a death-grip on him. But I do know that what I heard coming out of Donald on Broad Street last Friday was a gift. Just like me, and just like you, Donald will give an account to God for what he did with the gift, but what was flowing out of that drunken man was the evidence that the gift is irrevocable…God gave it and he isn’t taking it back.

Your gift…my gift…Donald’s gift…they do not belong to the individual. My gift is not my gift; it is a gift that God has given to the body, and for whatever reason He has chosen to package the gift in my wretched flesh.

“As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches” -Rev. 3:19-22

…and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.

I’m sorry Donald for considering your sin worse than mine; and I am sorry Jesus for thinking that my gift was all my own doing.

2011 Dave Daubenmire - All Rights Reserved

Coach Dave Daubenmire, founder and President of Pass The Salt Ministries www.ptsalt.com and Minutemen United www.minutemenunited.org, is host of the high octane Pass The Salt radio show heard in Columbus, Ohio.

In 1999 Coach Daubenmire was sued by the ACLU for praying with his teams while coaching high school in Ohio. He now spends his energy fighting for Christian principles in the public domain.

E-Mail: coach@ptsalt.com

Royal Heir

DNA of Humans/Animals is Being Changed...

...as in the days of Noah.

Lauren Moret is a scientist who worked at Lawrence Berkeley Nuclear Laboratory for five years. She is a geological expert and international radiation expert. Jeff Rense has made a short video interview of her discussing this subject. I have also transcribed her words from the video if you would prefer to read them (below the video link):

Google's Sinister DNA Plans

Transcript:

Moret: So, what they've done is - Microsoft was set up so that there would be one global operating system that the US Gov't had a back door into, for all computers everywhere in the world. Then, they set up Google as a search engine; and let's just look at the background of the two guys who supposedly set it up (Sergey Brin, Larry Page).

Sergey Brin was born in Russia. His father was a mathematician that worked for the Univ of MD, and his mother worked for NASA. And that is exactly where Brin and Page park their private jets - at the NASA facility.

Larry Page is an American. His parents were both computer science professors at Michigan State University. His father was one of the top experts in the US on Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Sergey Brin married a Polish American woman, and as soon as she married Brin she was given millions of dollars in venture capital the day they married.

What I want to emphasize is that Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and all of the social networking websites, Ebay, Skype, Google Mail, Yahoo Mail, PayPal - these are all the same entity. They're all integrated; they get bought and sold and traded around. These are all US Navy and military operations.

Now, I know a physicist who told me that they were tracking people in the lab by the electromagnetic frequency emitted by individual DNA. In other words, every living thing is an antenna that transmits and receives. We are electrical systems, and the DNA in every living thing has a unique frequency and signal. That is what they're using, what they're focusing on, and what they're weaponizing to completely control us.

The DNA Human Genome Project was carried out at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, where I was a staff scientist for five years. But, the Lawrence Livermore Lab, Los Alamos National Lab - these are all nuclear weapons labs - were also involved. That means the military - because the nuclear weapons labs exist for the Pentagon, and the Pentagon exists for the oil companies. So, the Human Genome Project was set up and well funded to experiment and
to research and to describe the human genome.

Now, how would they use that? Well, what we know about Google is that they are doing DNA surveys from space. This would be NASA and the Navy. NASA is run by the Navy. They have been tracking and identifying isolated populations - for instance, in the Amazon - who have never had contact with Western people. These are isolated people who are still living their traditional hunter-gatherer lives, and they've never seen a Westerner.

That's not just human DNA. They are also doing a global species survey. I've been tracking this for two years and notice that MANY new species are being discovered, and it seems to be on a grid system. So, they're doing a survey from space, and they went down the West Coast of South America, and then came up the east coast; and now they're in Southeast Asia. If you watch in the news, about once a week they come up with a new article and photo on new species they've discovered.

This is part of the United Nations Agenda 21 program, which is to identify all species and to do a complete global inventory of human and animals, and what David Rockefeller has said about Agenda 21 is that "in the end we're going to have a chip on every person and they will only be allowed to take out of the system what they put into it. If you work 12 hours a day, you're allowed to take 12 hours of something of value out of the system, but nothing more.

What is going on? The J. Craig Ventor Institute, which you sent me the article, has as their mission as "to forge new life forms." And they are also involved in manipulated computer code on DNA.

What does this mean? Well, Dr. Helen Wallace, from Gene Watch, in 2002 said: "We are in great danger," and she described this as a massive DNA database by the back door. What they're doing is using computing, medicine, technology, and the police state to converge into basically what is creating a totalitarian scientific oligarchy. Their purpose is to get this information and use it in discriminatory programs where the rich benefit and the poor are impacted negatively by these programs.

And the second part of that agenda is depopulation initiatives.

A really good example about this bio-piracy ... now, I did an interview with Dr. Win Parker, and on the air I was talking about depleted uranium and the tremendous affinity it has for the DNA and mitochondria, because uranium and phosphate structures have a love affair all through the universe - and that means that when people are exposed to uranium particles from these wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan and Yugoslavia ... and by the way, its over here in two weeks, in the US, and we're inhaling it all the time... it sticks to our DNA and our mitochondria that provide all the energy for the body.

Rense: Somebody made the decision to go ahead and use it against the people of Yugoslavia and then Iraq, knowing full well what would happen. And that's a party I would like to see brought to justice.

Moret: So as I was sitting there describing all of this to Dr. Parker and I was talking about HAARP... this is all integrated into the HAARP system...I knew that Dr Parker was not his real name. I knew that he was a CIA scientist. I knew he worked for the US Gov't, for the Dept of Defense, for the World Health Organization, and the UN at different times; and I knew that he was a microbiologist to view the whole field because he had to advise the government. And I just said, "Dr Parker, what is the application of this discovery that nanoparticles are transmitters?"

And, he caught his breath, and he said, "Well, it's to redesign the human genome." That's all.

Rense: To create a new species is what they're talking about.

Moret: It's to create anything they want to. It's to repeat anything they want to. It's this insane totalitarian scientific oligarchy that's run by psychopaths, and they can do anything they want to.

Now, what is transmitting and receiving, that's around us? How about cell phones? In the Megahertz frequency band. These are just some abstracts that I'm going to read the titles of. This is 1996: Single and double strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation. (And they used the cell phone frequencies.) DNA
strand breaks in rat brain cells ... so they're talking about sterility, about cancer, and about altering people's behavior. And the airport scanners are doing the same thing.

Rense: There's very little attention being paid to the electric grid. It is surrounding you, and everybody you know, 24 hours a day. Your home, your office, it doesn't matter. It's called wiring in your walls - and that's 60 hertz electric service that you rely on to power your goodies - can also be used to carry any kind of telecommunication business you can imagine, and mind and
behavior altering and control platforms as well.

Moret: It's very simple to do because we are electrical systems, and we transmit and receive just like any other antenna. We're electrical beings. And a lot of this was described in the 1930s in the lectures that Bertrand Russell gave at Oxford University. And I would like to read a paragraph:

"A totalitarian government with a scientific bent might do things that to us would seem horrifying. The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia and were more inclined to the atrocities that I have in mind. [They were said - I do not know with what truth - to use prisoners in concentration camps as material for all kinds of experiments, some involving death after much pain.] If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military
advantages.

"The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5% of males and 30% of females will be sterilised. The 30% of females will be expected to spend the years from 18-40 in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method. The unsterilised, if they desire the pleasures of love, will usually have to seek them with sterilised partners. "

In other words, Bertrand Russell's message is that wild reproduction is no longer an option.

So, basically, they have unlimited budgets, an unlimited scientific body in universities to do all this research, and today over 50% of scientific research money in universities comes from the Pentagon.

__________________
I have indicated the numerical references at these points on the video, and what they show, if you want to look any of them up:
3:19 Chart: The Electromagnetic Spectrum
3:25 Chart: Electromagnetic Spectrum
6:55 Reference to Science magazine article: Researchers Are the First to "Boot Up" a Bacterial Cell with a Synthetic Genome
7:00 Mail Online site article Reference: Scientist accused of playing God after creating artificial life by making designer microbe from scratch - but could it wipe out humanity?
7:30 Ref. to GeneWatch UK
8:10: Slide:Bertrand Russell [atheist] wrote in 1952 in "The Impact of Science on Society," that: Diet, injections and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
8:43: CNN News Flash "Birth Defects in Fallujah"
8:56: Chart: What is depleted uranium?
9:02: 2/19/06 Times of London headline: "UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells"
9:16: Headline: Uranium Found in Kansas Drinking Water Supplies
Headline: Oases in Navajo desert contained a witch's brew (uranium)
9:27: www.apfn.org "Depleted Uranium Alert"
9:40: Headline: GI's Brains Fried by Military Dispensed Nose Candy (uranium)
9:45: HAARP
10:16: More than 20 world-class microbiologists have been murdered since 2002, mostly in the US and the UK. Nearly all were working on development of ethnic-specific bio-weapons (see Smart Dust, Roboflies). From 2004 & continuing.
10:27: In his 1931 book, the Scientific Outlook, Bertrand Russell wrote: "Perhaps by means of injections and drugs and chemicals the population could be induced to bear whatever its scientific masters may decide to be for its good."
10:41: In Huxley's Brave New World (1932), the lower classes are exposed to a variety of chemicals before they are "born" that reduce their intelligence and adult height and prepare them for the role they will fulfill when they grow up. Ref. article:
http://davidrothscum.blogspot.com/2009/07/biochemical-manipulation-of-humanity.html (Link to Article)
10:53: Alcohol is used, lower castes receive less oxygen, and they are exposed to x-rays. The lower castes are also exposed to certain hormones to make them infertile. 70% of women are exposed in the womb to male hormones, and turned into so called "freemartins," sterilized women who exhibit masculine behavior.
11:13: Ref. article: Cell Phone Brain Damage: Part Deux
11:23: Pix of cell phone electricals on human
11:33: Ref: Mobile phones 'harm blood cells'
11:45: Our brains are extremely vulnerable to any technology which sends out ELF waves, because they immediately start resonating to the outside signal by a kind of tuning-fork effect. Puharich experimented discovering 7.83 Hz ('earth's pulse rate') made a person 'feel good' - producing an altered-state.
10.80 Hz causes riotous behavior, and 6.6 Hz causes depression. Puharich made ELF waves change RNA and DNA, breaking hydrogen bonds to make a person have a higher vibratory rate.
Ref. HAARP article at: http://www.haarp.net/mindcontrol.htm
12:02: Ref. to Airport Scanners (pose low risk by themselves; it's the constant bombardment from everywhere that's the problem)
12:32: Ref. article: Electronic harassment and electronic torture list 2/26/09-12/24/09
14:18. Lawrence, Kansas, 11/28/08 article. The radioactive element uranium has been found above federal limits in the drinking water supplies of nine Kansas communities, says Don Whittemore, a geochemist with the Kansas Geological Survey. Now these communities must devise solutions to bring down the uranium levels.
14:29: Ref. Google accused of bio-piracy.

Royal Heir

Deceptive Bible Versions

For a number of years I have wanted to really study the accuracy of the various versions of the Bible, believing that in this age of great deception there might be something to the "King James Only" argument. Well, there is.

If you are interested in learning the truth, I would recommend that you start with Christian J. Pinto's amazing DVD "A Lamp in the Dark.", a 3-hour documentary of the history of the Bible. (If you live near me, I'll lend it to you.) This website has some other wonderful information, including an article about Glenn Beck, which I have previously warned you about.

Another very informative site is here. If you love the most popular Bible currently available, the NIV, you need to go to this site.

And from Chick Publications:

The starting point:

The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver
tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou
shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve
them from this generation for ever. (Psalm 12:6-7)

Your decision:

You must decide whether or not you believe God has kept this promise.
Did He preserve His Word throughout the generations? Or did He not?
That decision will lead you to one of two Bible texts.

Here's your choice:

1. You believe God preserved His Word

If God kept His promise, then what we need to do is simple. Have archaeologists find all the copies and pieces of copies they can find that have survived from ancient times. If God kept his promise, copying errors will not have polluted the text. Instead, when we compare the copies from churches all over the ancient world, we will find that they agree, that they all had basically the same text. If we occasionally find a copy that does not match the others, we will throw it out, knowing that it was made by a sloppy copyist.

This has, in fact been done. The Old Testament Hebrew text was preserved by the Levites. The apostles quoted it, and we can trust it. For the New Testament, of all the copies in existence today, 95% agree in an incredible way. God did keep His promise! Only 5%, a tiny minority, are "messed up." All we have to do is put together a Hebrew and Greek text made up from our overwhelming majority of ancient texts, and we will have a text that we can be confident is exactly the same as the one held by the early church. Today, this text is called by several names, the most common being the "Received Text" or "Textus Receptus."

This was the text used by devout translators like William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin and others, some of whom died to preserve the Scriptures. If they were going to have to die for it, they were determined to die for the right text! This is also the text used to make the most famous and durable of all English Bibles, the King James Bible.

No modern English Bible translation uses this text! But that's another story.

2. You do not believe God preserved His Word

If you believe that God did not keep His promise, then you have to expect that as people copied the Scriptures, mistakes constantly crept in. The next copyist would copy those mistakes, and add some of his own. As time went on, the Scriptures held by the church would deteriorate, becoming worse and worse, until nobody would really know what the originals said.

If you believed that, you would want archaeologists to search for the oldest copies of the Scriptures they could find. The idea is that the older it is, the closer it is to the original. You could never be sure you had an accurate copy, but the oldest manuscript would give you the best possible copy, with whatever errors it may contain. This is the method being used by all modern Bible translators today.

They have had archaeologists search the world over, and have found two very ancient copies. One was in the library at the Vatican. It's logical to call this one the "Vaticanus." The other one was deposited in a waste basket at Saint Catherine's Monastery on the Sinai Peninsula, and is thus called the "Sinaiticus." These two copies of the Scriptures, given to us by the Roman Catholic Church, originally came from Alexandria, Egypt, the fountainhead of great heresies of the early church. These two manuscripts disagree with 95% of the broad historical evidence, and they also disagree with each other.

But if they disagree, how do you base a Bible on them? That's simple... find a scholar you consider an expert. Whenever these two copies disagree, have your expert pick the one he likes. We will consider that to be the correct version of that particular verse. Thus, in reality, you are placing your faith in the opinions of this great scholar, instead of the broad evidence of history, left for us by the God of history.

It's kind of hard to have faith in a Bible made from that, isn't it? But if you don't believe God kept His promise, that's the best you can do. This is, in fact, the view held by the majority of Bible translators today. Since they don't believe they can possibly have a reliable, accurate copy anyway, they feel great liberty to add their own private ideas, or interpretation, to the Scriptures. Thus, we get a multitude of Bibles, that very clearly do not say the same thing! What's a person to do?

My personal favorite Bible is the original 1909 version of the Old Scofield KJV Reference Bible (the study notes are unparalleled), and I plan to order The 1560 Geneva Bible (Reproduction) and the 1526 Tyndale New Testament soon. The Geneva Bible was the accepted version for 100 years after the KJV was printed, and it was the Bible the Puritans brought to America.

It's impossible to say which of the old versions is best in my opinion. I haven't researched this at all, but just from my study of Bible versions I'm thinking the battle between Armenians and Calvinists must have had its roots in the Reformation battle. Well, that's another study for another day.

The Lord is able to speak to those He wants to speak to, regardless of versions. He speaks with no version at all when He so chooses. There was a time in the ancient past when He spoke through the heavenly beings - the cosmos - and nature. He chooses as He chooses.

If He calls you, be eternally thankful.

~ ~ ~

Royal Heir

Bible Translator: "I'm In Trouble With The Lord"

Bible Translator Says, ‘I'm In Trouble With The Lord.'

Dr. Frank Logsdon, member of the translation committee for the New American Standard Version (NASB), has denounced his work on that Bible and urged all Christians to return to the Authorized Version, commonly known as the King James Bible.

Although the most popular translation at the present time is the New International Version, both of these modern Bibles are based upon the same Catholic text, and Logsdon's concerns apply to both.

Being involved with the project from the very beginning, Logsdon helped publisher F. Dewey Lockman with the feasibility study that led to the translation. He interviewed some of the translators, sat with them, and even wrote the preface. But soon the questions began coming in.

His old friend, Dr. David Otis Fuller, began to put his finger on the many shortcomings of the Catholic text used in all modern Bibles, which include the NASB and today's NIV.

Logsdon finally said, "I'm in trouble; I can't refute these arguments; it's wrong; it's terribly wrong; it's frightfully wrong; and what am I going to do about it?"

Logsdon shocked publisher Dewey Lockman by writing, "I must under God renounce every attachment to the New American Standard."

Logsdon then began to travel extensively, trying to make up for his error by explaining to people the very simple reasons why the Authorized Version is the one Bible which is absolutely 100% correct.

Along with many other scholars, Logsdon had blindly accepted the basic argument used today to support the use of the two Catholic manuscripts, the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus, in all modern Bibles.

The "experts" claim that these are the oldest manuscripts in existence, so they must be the best!

In one of his many public speeches, Logsdon explained, "When there is an omission that might be observed, they put in the margin, ‘Not in the oldest manuscripts.' But they don't tell you what those oldest manuscripts are. What oldest manuscripts?

Or they say, ‘Not in the best manuscripts.' What are the best manuscripts? They don't tell you. You see how subtle that is?

The average man sees a little note in the margin which says ‘not in the better manuscripts' and he takes for granted they are scholars and they must know, and then he goes on. That's how easily one can be deceived."

It was only after Logsdon took the time to really look into this issue that he was horrified to see that he had played right into Satan's hands, and helped to take many verses out of the Scriptures. Logsdon admitted, "The deletions are absolutely frightening."

The huge number of English Bible translations currently available has produced untold millions of dollars in sales, but does anyone believe that they have produced a modern Church which is more knowledgeable about their Bible? No, it has produced the Siamese twins of confusion and falling away from truth.

All modern Bible translators today use, without question, the New Testament text produced by the famous scholars Hort and Westcott.

But in her book, New Age Bible Versions, author Gail Riplinger exposes the background and corrupt theology of these giants.

Many readers are surprised at the beliefs of these men, documented by their own writings. Yet modern scholars accept their work without question, just as many university professors today blindly accept evolutionary teaching, safely going along with the crowd to protect their reputations. If you hold in your hand the Authorized Version, you have God's Truth.

History supports it, the Holy Spirit has confirmed it, God's Church has prospered by it. You will find it is hated by all those who seek to make an elastic Bible that is all things to all people… which then becomes nothing to anyone.

Logsdon's advice? If you hold the Authorized Version, and someone tries to prod you to accept another, "You don't need to defend it; you don't need to apologize for it.

"Just say, ‘Well, did this new version or this translation come down through the Roman Catholic stream? If so, count me out.'"

Quick Comparison of Bible Versions

It is often said that all Bible versions are basically the same, that their differences are just minor wording changes. Read the following comparison between the King James Version and the best-selling modern Bible translation, the New International Version, and then decide for yourself whether or not this is true. We have added bold text to assist the reader in recognizing changes.

KING JAMES BIBLE

NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION

Why did Jesus come to earth?

Luke 9:56 For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village. Matt. 18:11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.

Luke 9:56 and they went to another village. Matt. 18:11 (missing)

Is repentance important?

Matt. 9:13 ...I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Matt. 9:13 ...I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.

For whom did Jesus die?

I Cor. 5:7 ...Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

I Cor. 5:7 ...Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.

In Whom must you believe to be saved?

John 6:47 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.

John 6:47 I tell you the truth, he who believes has everlasting life.

Was Joseph really the father of Jesus?

Luke 2:33 And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him.

Luke 2:33 The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him.

Did Jesus give His disciples power to heal?

Mark 3:15 ...power to heal sickness, and to cast out devils.

Mark 3:15 ...authority to drive out demons.

If it's hard to do, should we just remove it?

Mark 11:26 But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.

Mark 11:26 (missing)

Who is in charge?

I Cor. 10:28 ...for the earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof:

I Cor. 10:28 (last part of verse missing)

How must we deal with our enemies?

Matt. 5:44 ...Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

Matt. 5:44 ...Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.

Where did Jesus go?

John 16:16 A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.

John 16:16 In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me.

Question: Aren't some of these things included in the NIV in the footnotes?
Answer: That is not the same as including them in the text. When a young Christian sees these passages have been moved to the footnotes, he or she will assume that they are probably not really part of God's Word. After all, the translators did not include them in the text, but simply implied that "some" manuscripts include them. What they are not told is that the vast majority of texts used by the early church - the best texts - included these words. They are God's Words.

Royal Heir

Rome's War On The Bible - Part 3 of 3

A new attack to the Holy Bible came in the 1830's through the Oxford Movement, whose goal was to try to 'romanize' the protestant churches and change it back under it's pre-Reformation authority of Rome. This led to a renewed interest in pre-Reformation liturgy, doctrine and practice in some of the protestant churches (through infiltration). Some members ended up leaving the Church of England and joining the Catholic Church, most notably Newman and Manning, both of whom went on to become Cardinals.

In the second half of the 19th century, the influence of the Oxford Movement was huge, and virtually every Anglican parish church changed from being a 'preaching house' to one where the altar was the focus of worship. Some parishes went further, defining themselves as Anglo-catholic, and evidence of their position survives today in the form of elaborate redecorations in the English churches. The Oxford Movement's influence on modern Anglican theology in England remains central, and Newman is often referred to as 'the father of Vatican II'.

Part of the fruit of this new movement by Rome was the English Revised Version of the Bible, which was not what it claimed to be. It was created by Westcott and Hort, great admirers of Newman and the Oxford Movement - and the Jesuits. The Jesuits met in Italy in 1825 to speak of the great work. They intended to take control of the Bible once again; the main target was the King James Version which they wanted to eradicate.

Modern Bible Translations

The starting point for understanding the problem with modern Bible translations are the falsely revered Alexandrian manuscripts, Codex Vaticanus & Sinaiticus. These are highly inferior manuscripts, but through successful marketing to the churches by Rome's agents, have been accepted by the majority of ministers and church leaders as authoritative, under the philosophy of 'the more you hear it, the more it is taken for truth.'

Sinaticus and Vaticanus are considered by most Bible scholars to be the oldest New Testament manuscripts available. They date back to the 4th century. Since they are considered to be the oldest, the scholars automatically consider them to be the best and most reliable manuscripts. But are they? Sinaticus and Vaticanus disagree with about 90-95% of all known manuscripts, and they even disagree among themselves. Both have a long history of corruption and obscurity (and almost certain tampering).

The Vaticanus is so named because it is contained in the Vatican library (several strikes against it right there); it is the sole property of the Vatican. It was discovered on a shelf there in 1481, where it had been forgotten for centuries. It is closely guarded by the Catholic church, and only certain individuals are allowed to see it. When a scholar is allowed to read it, they are watched carefully, and if the guard thinks that they have looked at a certain passage for too long or too closely, they will force the scholar to leave the manuscript. The Vatican has released a photographic copy of Vaticanus, but even this is suspect because they may have altered the text in the copy.

Sinaticus is so named because it was found in 1844 at St. Catherine's Monastery. located at the base of Mt. Sinai. It was found in a trash can, waiting to be burned. The monks knew that it was worthless, especially since it had been written over and corrected several times after it had been initially written.

Sinaticus and Vaticanus disagree with each other at 3000+ times in the Gospels alone. It is estimated that the two manuscripts disagree with each other at least 7000 times. These are major disagreements, not spelling or punctuation. Such disagreements mean that at least one, if not both, are in error at that specific passage.

There is much more to be said against them, but let's move on. I will write a separate article on the details.

At any rate, the Codex Sinaticus had over 14,000 "corrections" to it, and of course the Pope loved it. Shortly, from the Vatican Library emerged Codex Vaticanus, which Rome said was more ancient still. Manuscript experts deny its age or authenticity . However, these two MS were combined into what is now known as the biblical Greek text used throughout the 20th Century as the basis for all new modern translations.

In 1967, the United Bible Society entered into an agreement with the Vatican to undertake hundreds of Bible translation projects worldwide, using 'functional equivalence principles.' (Source: Eugene A. Nida Biblical Institute.) The term, ' functional equivalence' is a fancy way of saying "paraphrase." A paraphrase is putting it into other words - not the words of God, in the case of His Word, the Bible - but in the words of someone else. Each of these paraphrased editions became farther and farther removed from the original languages.

"Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God." Romans 10:17 . How do these 'words of others' influence the "faith that was once delivered to the saints?"

Example of changing God's Word. Almost all of the modern translations misquote Luke 18:8. Here is the NIV: " ...when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?” The Greek reads "Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He find THE faith on earth." The definite article "the" is in the Greek. Interestingly, when I looked this up online I found the wrong translation even in the KJV, which either means it has an incorrect modern version, or that it was left out online. I found the Young's and Amplified Bibles to be correct online, and several commentaries had it correctly, including Scofield (KJV), hated so fervently by all of the New Age people. The addition of the article "the" makes all the difference in the world, since it speaks of faith in the whole body of Christian doctrine.

"...if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." Matthew 24:24

In October 2008 delegates from the American Bible Society presented Pope Benedict XVI a special polyglot Bible that bears the seals of both the Vatican and the ABS. The ABS also publishes the Contemporary English Version, a newer Bible that has now completely removed the word "Antichrist" from its translation. In its place they have "enemy of Christ," removing half its original meaning. "Anti" means "against" and "instead of" - against Christ and a replacement for Christ, making provision for the man of sin. The understanding of Bible prophecy will surely be affected by how the words of God are translated. Some are even predicting that a new International Bible is being planned, one that will completely omit the Book of Revelation.

Through various Bible societies the Vatican now influences biblical translations in hundreds of languages around the world. The question all Christians should ask is this: After 1000 years of persecuting and murdering the saints, has Rome now turned over a new leaf, or is she simply pursuing new tactics to achieve an ancient agenda?

"And Jesus answering said to them, 'Take heed that no one may lead you astray..." Matt. 24:4

Royal Heir

Rome's War on The Bible - Part 2 od 3

Myles Coverdale and John Rogers had remained loyal disciples the last six years of Tyndale's life, and they carried the English Bible project forward and even accelerated it. Coverdale finished translating the Old Testament, and in 1535 he printed the first complete Bible in the English language, making use of Luther's German text and the Latin as additional sources. Thus, the first complete English Bible was printed on October 4, 1535, and is known as the Coverdale Bible.

In 1547 King Henry VIII died. Under the reign of his son, Edward, England finally became firmly Protestant.

The reign of "Bloody Mary" was determined to destroy all English Bibles and the readers and translators of it. Over 800 scholars escaped to Geneva and began translating without Rome or the English Monarch. They produced the Geneva Bible in 1560, which was translated from the Aramaic, Greek and Hebrew, and dedicated to Queen Elizabeth I. This is the Bible - known as the Bible of the Protestant Reformation - which was brought by the Puritans to America on the Mayflower in 1620. The Geneva Bible is the Bible upon which America was founded.

The Geneva Bible featured a number of radical never-before-seen changes: It was the first Bible in English to add numbered verses to each chapter of scripture. Also, the Geneva was the first Bible to introduce easier-to-read “Roman Style Typeface” rather than the “Gothic Blackletter Style Typeface” which had been used exclusively in earlier Bibles. The Geneva was also the first “Study Bible” with extensive commentary notes by the reformers in the margins. The Geneva Bible is the only Bible ever able to outsell and exceed the popularity of the King James Bible, as it did in the early 1600’s until its printing ceased in 1644.

Most Protestants have never even heard of the Bible of their own heritage: the Geneva Bible. It was produced by John Calvin, John Knox, Myles Coverdale, John Foxe, & other English refugees in Geneva, Switzerland… fleeing the persecution of Roman Catholic Queen “Bloody” Mary in England. Mary would not tolerate the Protestant Geneva Bible, which proclaimed the Pope the Antichrist in its commentary notes.

Enter the Jesuits

"Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived." 2 Timothy 3:12-13

In 1540 Pope Paul III commissioned the Jesuits to overthrow the Reformation. The Jesuits were founded as a military order by Ignatius Loyola. It has always been known for its deceptions, infiltrations and assassinations, having been expelled from at least 83 countries and cities. President Adams was fervently against them and feared them getting a foothold in America. Their ultimate aim has always been to destroy the Reformation. They were hated and feared by kings and rulers.

The Jesuit oath is evil and horrific, and was well known prior to the 20th Century. You can read it here. Their purpose was to infiltrate churches, schools, seminaries and universities, to actually become intellectual leaders, professors and protestant ministers - and infiltrate within the protestant churches. By 1566 they were in scores of colleges. By 1749 they were in 669 colleges, 176 protestant seminaries and 24 universities. At the same time, they destroyed all opposition against the pope and the RCC through killings and every other means. The Inquisition was reinstated and millions more killed. There were 25 assassination attempts on Queen Elizabeth I, considered England's head of the Protestant churches.

Rome referred to the people's Bible as 'the paper Pope.' They developed a confession just for use by Protestants converting to Catholicism, stating that the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church was greater in every aspect than the Bible, and than Jesus Christ Himself. The Jesuits were behind - and dominated - the Council of Trent, to refute the doctrines of the Reformation, key doctrines being salvation and grace. The Council of Trent was reconfirmed at Vatican II.

They declared the Latin Vulgate better than all other Bibles, and the Jesuit's Douay-Rhiems Version was produced to justify Catholicism, changing words, meaning and footnotes to accommodate the RCC's apostate doctrines.

In 1605 the devised the Gunpowder Plot and attempted to blow up the entire British Parliament. However, the Plot was overthrown and the King James Bible was completed under Henry and finally published in 1611, and ended the extensive use of all the various translations.

The meticulous translation by scores of the finest Hebrew and Greek scholars, with the best transcripts, who produced the King James Bible was unequaled - and still is - in the world of Bible translation. They worked in teams, each team taking a section and working individually. When finished, the teams traded transcripts, and began again, individually translating. In the end, the work had been examined fourteen times by these teams highly skilled in the languages.
The two primary criteria used were 1) verbal equivalence and 2) formal equivalence (form), keeping footnotes to a minimum. Over time the KJV overtook all other translations and came to symbolize the unified efforts of all the Reformers.

This Bible, of course, came under immediate and incessant attack by Rome, through the Jesuits, and it's attack continues unceasingly today to keep the truth of the gospel from reaching people.

To be continued.

Royal Heir

Rome's War On The Bible - Part 1 of 3

First, let me say unequivocally, that the fault I find is not with Catholic laymen. They are innocent victims of the Great Harlot of the Christian world. Many, in fact, have found true salvation in Jesus Christ. Anything I write about the Roman Catholic Church is written about the institution and the leadership, from the very top down to the local priest. They have no excuse.

The history of the Roman Catholic Church is something I want to write a series about. However, it is a daunting task. The history of the RCC is a history of evil and relentless persecution of true Christians. I find it telling that you never, ever hear about this in church pulpits anymore. I was raised on it. But, then, it requires courage to talk about it - a quality that is difficult to find these days - especially in church pulpits.

The RCC is the major player in Satan's global religion, which is being formed right now. That religion is not restricted to the RCC, but spreads it's tentacles across the globe to include and meld all the religions of earth, EXCEPT the true church, the bride of Christ ... born again Christians ... who are not identified by any particular organization or institution.

The RCC has fought to suppress God's Word, the Bible, since its beginning. Catholicism is pagan to the core. It began with the leaders of the pagan religious leaders who were afraid that Christianity would steal their pagan worshippers, and therefore they decided to put the cloak of Christianity on their pagan worship. The majority leadership today is as wicked as it was then.

The Roman Catholic Church got a real boost from Constantine, who declared Christianity the state religion. However, Constantine himself was a pagan priest, and continued as such in his new role as the head of the new state religion. He called himself the Vicar of Christ, Pontifus Maximus, names which we all recognize because they are still the titles of the Roman church. One can legitimately, therefore, question the reality of any real conversion as a disciple of Jesus Christ. Any true convert would immediately reject anything pagan.

This new 'universal faith' began immediately persecuting Christians! That is to say, true Christians who refused to identify with the state church. Many historians believe this was the true beginning of the Dark Ages. "Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." 2 Timothy 3:12.

"They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me. But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you." John 16:2-4

Since my interest here is the Bible, we won't go into the centuries which passed and brought about the Crusades. Suffice it to say that the Roman Catholic Church outlawed the translation, possession or reading of God's Word by anyone outside the church hierarchy, thus keeping the Bible out of the hands of ordinary people who would immediately have seen the truth of the gospel.

During these centuries Christians were murdered for their faith. They were hunted down and killed by the agents of the RCC. Careful estimates of the total death toll cite over 50 million people were murdered for refusal to become Catholics.

The real seeds of the Protestant Reformation began with John Wycliffe. The first hand-written English language Bible manuscripts were produced in 1380's AD by John Wycliffe, an Oxford professor, scholar, and theologian. Wycliffe was well-known throughout Europe for his opposition to the teaching of the organized Church, which he believed to be contrary to the Bible. With the help of his followers, called the Lollards, and his assistant Purvey, and many other faithful scribes, Wycliffe produced dozens of English language manuscript copies of the scriptures. They were translated out of the Latin Vulgate, which was the only source text available to Wycliffe. The Pope was so infuriated by his teachings and his translation of the Bible into English, that 44 years after Wycliffe had died, he ordered the bones to be dug-up, crushed, and scattered in the river. (Note: 44 is a revered occult number. Our current President is also #44.)

One of Wycliffe’s followers, John Hus, actively promoted Wycliffe’s ideas: that people should be permitted to read the Bible in their own language, and they should oppose the tyranny of the Roman church that threatened anyone possessing a non-Latin Bible with execution. Hus was burned at the stake in 1415, with Wycliffe’s manuscript Bibles used as kindling for the fire. The last words of John Hus were that, “in 100 years, God will raise up a man whose calls for reform cannot be suppressed.” Almost exactly 100 years later, in 1517, Martin Luther nailed his famous 95 Theses of Contention (a list of 95 issues of heretical theology and crimes of the Roman Catholic Church) into the church door at Wittenberg.

Johann Gutenberg invented the printing press in the 1450's, and the first book to ever be printed was a Latin language Bible, printed in Mainz, Germany. The invention of the movable-type printing press meant that Bibles and books could finally be effectively produced in large quantities in a short period of time. This was essential to the success of the Reformation.

In the 1490’s another Oxford professor, and the personal physician to King Henry the 7th and 8th, Thomas Linacre, decided to learn Greek. After reading the Gospels in Greek, and comparing it to the Latin Vulgate, he wrote in his diary, “Either this (the original Greek) is not the Gospel… or we are not Christians.” The Latin had become so corrupt that it no longer even preserved the message of the Gospel… yet the Church still threatened to kill anyone who read the scripture in any language other than Latin… though Latin was not an original language of the scriptures.

In 1496, John Colet, another Oxford professor and the son of the Mayor of London, started reading the New Testament in Greek and translating it into English for his students at Oxford, and later for the public at Saint Paul’s Cathedral in London. The people were so hungry to hear the Word of God in a language they could understand, that within six months there were 20,000 people packed in the church and at least that many outside trying to get in. Fortunately for Colet, he was a powerful man with friends in high places, so he managed to avoid execution.

In considering the experiences of Linacre and Colet, the great scholar Erasmus was so moved to correct the corrupt Latin Vulgate, that in 1516, with the help of printer John Froben, he published a Greek-Latin Parallel New Testament. The Latin part was not the corrupt Vulgate, but his own fresh rendering of the text from the more accurate and reliable Greek, which he had managed to collate from a half-dozen partial old Greek New Testament manuscripts he had acquired. This was the first non-Latin Vulgate text of the scripture to be produced in 1000 years, and the first ever to come off a printing press. The 1516 Greek-Latin New Testament of Erasmus further focused attention on just how corrupt and inaccurate the Latin Vulgate had become, and how important it was to go back and use the original Greek (New Testament) and original Hebrew (Old Testament) languages to maintain accuracy.

Erasmus published the Latin Vulgate and the Greek version side by side so that people could see for themselves the difference. In fact, the Latin Vulgate was so corrupt that Erasmus had to re-translate it, and people were able to see the differences between the two Latin translations alone ... much less the difference between the Latin and the Greek translations. To give just one example, the Latin translated "penance" for "repentance," thus justifying the practice of penances and all the corruption that went with it. These works of Erasmus were an absolute bombshell.

William Tyndale was the Captain of the Army of Reformers, and was their spiritual leader. Tyndale holds the distinction of being the first man to ever print the New Testament in the English language. Tyndale was a true scholar and a genius, so fluent in eight languages that it was said one would think any one of them to be his native tongue. He is frequently referred to as the “Architect of the English Language”, (even more so than William Shakespeare) as so many of the phrases Tyndale coined are still in our language today. He also supported Henry VIII in his desire to rid England of the Pope and the Roman Church. Tyndale was hated and hunted by Rome. Caught up in the political and religious intrigue between the Pope and the King of England, Tyndale was finally strangled and burnt at the stake by an English cabal in the prison yard, Oct. 6, 1536. His last words were, "Lord, open the king of England's eyes." This prayer was answered three years later, in the publication of King Henry VIII’s 1539 English “Great Bible,” which was delivered to the people.

Martin Luther declared his intolerance for the Roman Church’s corruption on Halloween in 1517, by nailing his 95 Theses of Contention to the Wittenberg Church door. Luther, who would be exiled in the months following the Diet of Worms Council in 1521 that was designed to martyr him, would translate the New Testament into German for the first time from the 1516 Greek-Latin New Testament of Erasmus, and publish it in September of 1522. Luther also published a German Pentateuch in 1523, and another edition of the German New Testament in 1529. In the 1530’s he would go on to publish the entire Bible in German.

End of Part 1.

Royal Heir

Prepare To Meet Your Maker

Matter on earth is perhaps being changed by sun particles. Very important 7-minute video here.

For months mounting fear has driven researchers to wring their hands over the approaching solar storms. Some have predicted devastating solar tsunamis that could wipe away our advanced technology, others voiced dire warnings that violent explosions on the surface of the sun could reach out to Earth, breach our magnetic field, and expose billions to high intensity X-rays and other deadly forms of cancer-causing radiation.

Now evidence has surfaced that something potentially more dangerous is happening deep within the hidden core of our life-giving star: never-before-seen particles—or some mysterious force—is being shot out from the sun and it's hitting Earth.

Whatever it is, the evidence suggests it's affecting all matter.

Strange and unknown

Alarmed physicists first became aware of this threat over the past several years. Initially dismissed as an anomaly, now frantic scientists are shooting e-mails back and forth to colleagues across the world attempting to grasp exactly what is happening to the sun.

Something impossible has happened. Yet the "impossible" has been proven to be true. Laboratories around the globe have confirmed that the rate of radioactive decay—once thought to be a constant and a bedrock of science—is no longer a constant. Something being emitted from the sun is interacting with matter in strange and unknown ways with the startling potential to dramatically change the nature of the very Earth itself.

Exactly what has scientists so on edge is the fact that the natural rate of decay of atomic particles has always been predictable. Indeed, using the decay rate of Carbon-14 has been a method to date archeological artifacts. The process, known as carbon dating, measures the quantity of Carbon-14 within organic objects. According to the numbers, Carbon-14 has a specific half-life of 5,730 years. Physicists have proven through exhaustive observation and experimentation over the course of a century that it takes 5,730 years for Carbon-14 atoms to decay into a stable Nitrogen-14.

The values don't change—or at least they never have in the past. With certain evidence that radioactive decay can be significantly affected by an unknown effect from the sun, much of science is turned on its head.

Rate of decay speeding up

Worst of all, if the decay rates of matter are being mutated then all matter on Earth is being affected including the matter that makes up life.

The mutation may go so far as to change the underlying reality of the quantum universe—and by extrapolation-the nature of life, the principles of physics, perhaps even the uniform flow of time.

In fact, some evidence of time dilation has been gleaned from close observation of the decay rate. If particles interacting with the matter are not the cause—and matter is being affected by a new force of nature-then time itself may be speeding up and there's no way to stop it.

______________________________END OF ARTICLE

Other links related to this:

The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements

POINTS OF ORIGINS: Can Radioactive Element Decay Rates Change?

Radioactive decay rates vary with the sun's rotation: research

Sunspot activity at 8,000-year high

Is the Sun Emitting a Mystery Particle?

The mystery of the varying nuclear decay

Royal Heir

Finally, The Truth About The Oil Spill?

Unbelievable and Incredible

The Gulf of Mexico is Dying

A Special Report on the BP Gulf Oil Spill

by Dr. Tom Termotto

Finally, A Third Party?

....Only one problem. It's been cooked up, and will be served up, by our oppressors. Maybe this will open the eyes of people to see how the NWO has always worked, and continues to work.

Rothschild-Sponsored Third Party Effort Unveiled
By Michael Collins Piper

LATEST IN AN ONGOING SERIES - Yes, the Rothschild dynasty-connected billionaire families and financial groups who own the mass media in America—interlocked with the banking interests controlling privately owned Federal Reserve System that dominates the world economic system—are planning to spring a “centrist” third party on the American people.

All-new revelations now appearing in the self-styled “mainstream” press fully confirm what AMERICAN FREE PRESS—alone among the media—first asserted seven months ago in a four-page exclusive special report published in its May 31 issue.

The opinion pages of the two most powerful newspapers in America—The New York Times and The Washington Post—have been rife with repetitive rhetoric about the need for the American people to reject both “the left” and “the right” and stand behind “centrists,” who will “end partisan gridlock.” But there has also been—behind the scenes—an ongoing, long-standing, carefully crafted scheme to set a “centrist” party in motion.

As AFP noted on Nov. 15, the first formal notice came in The New York Times on Oct. 3, when influential columnist Thomas L. Friedman, generally perceived as a “liberal,” noted grandly in a column entitled “Third Party Rising” that he knew of two separate efforts to launch such a “centrist” movement which he made clear was something he endorsed. Friedman tantalized readers by mentioning no specific names, but it was clear Friedman was writing from an “insider” standpoint.

On Nov. 28, writing in The Washington Post, Pulitzer Prize-winning “conservative” writer Kathleen Parker finally and formally lifted the veil of secrecy surrounding the third party venture in a commentary entitled, “Who will lead the centrists?” Her column revealed a new group, called “No Labels,” was being launched. Asserting “dissatisfaction with Washington’s systemic failings,” Ms. Parker wrote that “when the porridge is either too hot or too cold, the moment for something in between is ripe,” adding that “centrism has a place at the table by virtue of the sheer numbers of middle Americans, the depth of their disgust and the magnitude of our problems.”

Ms. Parker concluded that “There’s little appealing about either party dominated by a base that bears little resemblance to who we are as a nation or the way most of us live our lives. . . .” She then asked the question: “What if there were an alternative?” and added pointedly:

“All that’s missing from a centrist movement that could be formidable is a leader. Anyone?”

The Post columnist noted that among the key financial backers of No Labels is James Tisch. Although grass-roots Americans who might be attracted to a “third” party alternative probably don’t recognize his name, Tisch is a member of the billionaire family which grabbed control of the CBS media conglomerate in 1986, asserting its purpose was to ensure especially favorable coverage of Israel at a time of growing uneasiness with Israel’s Middle East intrigues.

An influential figure beyond question, Tisch has been president of the Jewish Communal Fund, was founding chairman of the Jewish Leadership Forum and serves on the executive committee of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee. He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the New York affiliate of the London-based Royal Institute of International Affairs, the foreign-policy-making arm of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

To underscore the importance of the No Labels venture, The Washington Post followed up Ms. Parker’s commentary by one published on Dec. 3 under the title “A grass-roots answer to gridlock,” written by two of the high-level founders of No Labels.

The two figures in question—a “liberal” Democrat and a “conservative” Republican—demonstrate the ostensible bipartisan (and distinctly internationalist) nature of the “centrist” effort: David Frum, a former special assistant and speechwriter to President George W. Bush and William Galston, a former domestic policy advisor to Bill Clinton.

Frum—a neo-conservative pro-Israel hard-liner (and hardly a “centrist”)—is infamous for coining the term “Axis of Evil,” which he inserted into a speech he wrote for Dubya Bush, who popularized the phrase as part of the “war on terrorism.” But, more notably, Frum once published an extended attack on nationalists who reject American globalism and warmongering (which just happen to be the central components of the New World Order agenda).

Likewise, the ties of Frum’s No Labels colleague, Galston, further illustrate the origins of the “centrist” scheme being unleashed. Galston is now a courtier to the publicly little-known, but globally influential Rothschild- allied billionaire Zilkha family and holds the chair in “governance studies” at the Brookings Institution, a post funded by Baghdad-born New York-based Ezra Zilkha, another key figure in the Council on Foreign Relations.

The heir to Khedori Zilkha—once described by The New York Sun as “a towering figure who bestrode the financial landscape of the Middle East, Europe, America and Asia and became an important player in international banking”—Ezra Zilkha was described by the Sun as “a living legend” in his own right, who assessed his own ancestry thusly: “My family were proud members of the Jewish community that Nebuchadnezzar established. When the Babylonian captivity ended and many Jews returned to Jerusalem, my ancestors stayed behind. I am always conscious of history. My sensibilities are rooted in antiquity.”

In their Post commentary, Galston and Frum announced that No Labels is engaged in organizing in every state and congressional district and that there will be a major national meeting held in New York on Dec. 13. They also revealed the underlying propaganda nature of their program. Over the next two years, No Labels operatives will be taking to task any and all who do not abide by their agenda. According to Galston and Frum:

"They will highlight those officials who reach across the aisle to help solve the country’s problems and criticize those who do not. They will call out politicians whose rhetoric exacerbates those problems, and they will establish lines that no one should cross. Politicians, media personalities and opinion leaders who recklessly demonize their opponents should be on notice that they can no longer do so with impunity. . . ."

In short, the purpose of No Labels will be to enforce a new “political correctness” enforced by public and media pressure, ensuring that anyone who goes beyond the approved “pale” and ventures into rhetoric and political discussion deemed unseemly will be held to account, subjected to widespread opprobrium.

For example, those who question the official government version of the 9-11 terrorist tragedy, or raise concerns about U.S. bias in favor of Israel in the conduct of Middle East policy, or object to unending budget-busting foreign military ventures, will be savaged as inimical to American national interests.

Frum and Galston claimed No Labels is “not a nascent third-party movement” nor a “stalking-horse for an independent candidacy” and that “it is not a front for anyone’s agenda.” However, the obvious political nature of the venture—which includes the formation of political action committee fundraising efforts—belies these protests. No Labels is clearly what it appears to be, another attempt to internationalize and bankrupt America.

A review of the No Labels website at nolabels.com lists a growing array of “advisors” who constitute a broad-ranging selection of journalists, pundits and publicists— few nationally known but all of whom have outreach in their own particular realms. And this marks a movement that could be especially influential.

The clique of media voices promoting the “centrist” movement has been hyping rhetoric referencing “American national greatness” and “American exceptionalism”—which rings soundly in the hearts of patriotic Americans—but these are terms that have a deeper meaning than might appear.

In fact, these terms have their origins in the writings of a host of so-called “ex-Trotskyite” agitators—now called “neo-conservatives”—who have energetically worked to suppress traditional American nationalism in the effort to remake the United States into a globe-straddling empire with the blood and treasure of the American people used to set in place a New World Order. The “conservative” internationalists and the “liberal” internationalists have bound together to work to bring this into being, and the “centrist” endeavor is at the foundation of what can only be described as a conspiracy, vastly inimical to America’s interests.

Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .

Sign up for our free e-newsletter here - get a free gift just for signing up!

(Issue # 51, December 20, 2010)

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

___________________END OF ARTICLE

I do not necessarily endorse the website and know nothing about it, but have seen a number of articles about this third party and wanted to spread the word.

Royal Heir

The Laodicean Church

While all seven of the churches mentioned in the Revelation of Jesus Christ can be applied to all Christian churches through the ages, many believe these seven churches are particularly applicable to seven stages of the church in history. That would make the modern church of today have special identity with the Laodicean Church.

It is certainly easy to see the parallels of indulgent deterioration, hastened by the corruption of a church whose god is really worldly wealth. The 20th Century in America was characterized by 'the American dream.' Wealth; getting rich. And that went for the church, too, which eagerly followed the rest of the world. It had its business models, modern accounting and fund-raising tactics, promises of prosperity for the Christian. Church became another big business, with its international programs, television and communication, its drama, theatre and "Christian" rock music.

Unfortunately, the church lost its way and its purpose, which was the Great Commission, sound doctrine and the perfecting of the saints. The Lord's condemnation of the Laodicean church was that it was spiritually apathetic and placed its faith in worldly wealth. It was "lukewarm."

"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.

"As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." Rev. 3:14-22.

The people are deceived. They see themselves as wealthy and self-sufficient. However, the Lord says they are "poor, blind and naked." As ironically as this applied to the ancient Laodicea - known for its banking, eye salve and clothing - it equally applies to the church of 2010, where finance, health and style (clothing) rules our culture.

The institutional church does not, and never has, converted the world. It is the individual members of the Body of Christ who are committed and obedient to God's Word who has won, and continues to win, individuals to Christ. This is the method through which the Lord calls out and perfects those whom He chooses for His own purposes. And these faithful individuals - not the great and famous 'names' or the masses who follow them - will be the ones to hear, "Well done, thou good and faithful servant." The others, the vast majority in the institutional church, will hear: "Depart from me. I never knew you."

This called-out body of believers has always been destined to be forged on the anvil of institutional apostasy, satanic infiltration and persecution. These are the ones who have gone faithfully through the fires of difficulty and remained obedient. These are the ones who will shine as bright as the stars when they finally come face to face with their Lord. These are the ones who place Jesus Christ at the helm of their lives, no matter what, and can say with Paul:

"...And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong." I Cor 12:5-10

Those individuals - the true church - rise to their best when pressures, limitations and opposition are applied. Then the weakness of the flesh exhibits the strength of the Holy Spirit, and the Lord is magnified and glorified.

Follow the Lord's voice rather than that of man. As He said, "My sheep know my voice." Yes, indeed.

Royal Heir

Something Is Coming ...Part II

Keeping in mind Part I, where a huge magnetic 'fluff cloud' is nearing, a cloud which has spiritual implications rather than physical ones, I want to talk/speculate about DNA, as I understand it.

We know that DNA is the carrier of the genetic code from which all genes are formed that are responsible for the development of the body. For a long time it was believed that this is only done on biochemical processes. The DNA forms a huge double strand of bases, which is encoded in the genetic information.

But Russian scientists have discovered that DNA is much more than biochemical. Almost 90% of it is not even required for protein synthesis, but serves as a communication and information storage.

The characteristic shape of the DNA double helix is an almost ideal electromagnetic antenna, which can send and receive very good electrical impulses and can absorb electromagnetic radiation (light) from the environment. This absorbed energy is stored in the DNA by the molecule to vibrate. So the DNA is not only the sender and receiver of electromagnetic energy, but also includes the information contained in the radiation, which the DNA interprets, similar to a highly complex interactive bio chip based on light.

According to the Russian research, the DNA understands everything, communicating on a syntactic and semantic level, which is common to all human languages. In fact, they posit that the DNA has the ability to understand suggestions.

Now, here I am wading into science that I barely comprehend, but the idea is that if magnetic fields determine the experience of time and even gravity, and can understand the operation of known forces in unknown ways, then a new magnetic environment could be a 'new realm.' Time and gravity are the two things we least understand about our universe.

An example is given of a Discovery show, where they powered up the most powerful electro-magnet in the world. The magnetism was all guided to one coffee-cup-sized elongated hole. They threw in a spider, and it levitated ... free from the bounds of gravity.

Gravity is tied to mass and space. Space is tied to time. So, what happens when a gigantic ribbon magnetic field (as in the 'fluff cloud') impacts the myriad of magnetic fields on earth, specifically on a person's DNA? Could this mean entering into a new realm? Is this similar - or the same as - the Rapture?

I have another thought. I have heard the New Ager's talk about 12-strand DNA. Our scientists talk about 11 dimensions. What if our DNA is altered every time we are given the access to a new dimension (which I believe is what happens in resurrection, rapture, etc.)?

I'm just asking the question! The rabbis believe in 11 dimensions, too. I don't know what the 12-strand idea is unless Satan's realm is the 12th. This is all sheer speculation, but it's interesting.

More magnetic field information here:
Galactic Magnetic fields may control boundaries of our solar system

Food for thought.

Royal Heir